Conclusion: Two Pillars of Truth Critical thinking - a civic duty

The Two Pillars of Truth

Introduction: Two Pillars of Truth

It is important to emphasize that the pursuit of truth and the application of rigorous critical thinking are not just intellectual exercises but moral and civic responsibilities. In his thought-provoking talk, Peter Boghossian reminds us that the Socratic method, or Socratic elenchus, is more than just a philosophical tool; it fosters what he calls “epistemological hygiene”—the ability to clean up our own cognitive processes. Boghossian argues that we can sharpen our thinking, refine our beliefs, and make better decisions by engaging in systematic questioning. This is not just an academic endeavor but a fundamental practice for living in a complex, ever-changing world.

Boghossian’s insights underscore the idea that critical thinking is essential not only for personal growth but for the collective health of society. As in Carl Sagan‘s interview with Charlie Rose, Boghossian stresses the danger of ignorance, especially in an era where technology and scientific advancements play such a dominant role. If we do not actively engage in critical questioning and skepticism, we risk becoming passive recipients of information, easily swayed by charismatic figures or deceptive narratives. This is why both Sagan and Boghossian call for a culture of questioning, in which people are encouraged to challenge their beliefs and those of others to arrive at more well-reasoned, evidence-based conclusions.

Sagan warned of the “combustible mixture of ignorance and power,” a society that relies heavily on science and technology yet remains ignorant of how it works. Similarly, Boghossian points out that true critical thinking—rooted in the Socratic tradition—is not merely about doubting or tearing down ideas; it’s about creating a space where people can collaboratively explore truth. This requires intellectual humility and a willingness to revise our beliefs in the face of new evidence or stronger arguments.

Our responsibility, therefore, extends beyond just personal growth. It involves contributing to a society that values skepticism, critical inquiry, and dialogue over dogma, zealotry, or superstition. As Boghossian notes, the Socratic method is not just a hallmark of Western thought but a tool that could be fundamental to any advanced civilization. The ability to critically examine ideas, question assumptions, and seek deeper understanding is a universal prerequisite for moral and intellectual progress.

We must take these lessons to heart and apply them in our daily lives, in our conversations, and in the way we approach decisions that affect our communities and our world. The principles of the scientific method and the Socratic elenchus offer us powerful frameworks for navigating an increasingly complex world. However, as Carl Sagan and Peter Boghossian emphasize, these frameworks only work if we actively engage with them. It is our responsibility to question, to think critically, and to foster a culture where truth-seeking is a shared value.

In the end, the future of our society and the sustainability of our civilization depend on our commitment to these principles. As Sagan warned, if we cannot challenge those in power or those who claim to know the truth, we become vulnerable to manipulation and deception. Boghossian adds that if we fail to practice the art of questioning, we miss the opportunity to refine our understanding and collectively move closer to truth.

Our responsibility is clear: we must be vigilant truth-seekers, practicing skepticism, fostering open dialogue, and never shying away from the hard work of testing and refining our beliefs. This is how we safeguard not only our own intellectual integrity but also the future of our civilization.

POST NAVIGATION

The Two Pillars of Truth

Introduction: Two Pillars of Truth

CHAPTER NAVIGATION

SEARCH