Science Literacy Magnifies Political Polarization on Policy-relevant Science Dan Kahan

It has been assumed (very reasonably) for many years that enlightened self-government demands a science-literate citizenry. Perversely, however, recent research has shown that all manner of reasoning proficiency – from cognitive reflection to numeracy, from actively open-minded thinking to science literacy – magnifies political polarization on policy-relevant science. Credit: Dan Kahan Source: Science curiosity research … Continue reading Science Literacy Magnifies Political Polarization on Policy-relevant Science Dan Kahan

Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-government Dan Kahan (2017)

Abstract Why does public conflict over societal risks persist in the face of compelling and widely accessible scientific evidence? We conducted an experiment to probe two alternative answers: the ‘science comprehension thesis’ (SCT), which identifies defects in the public’s knowledge and reasoning capacities as the source of such controversies; and the ‘identity-protective cognition thesis’ (ICT), … Continue reading Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-government Dan Kahan (2017)

Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (January 2017)

Abstract This article describes evidence suggesting that science curiosity counteracts politically biased information processing. This finding is in tension with two bodies of research. The first casts doubt on the existence of “curiosity” as a measurable disposition. The other suggests that individual differences in cognition related to science comprehension — of which science curiosity, if … Continue reading Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (January 2017)

Man Is Not a Rational Animal; He Is a Rationalizing Animal Robert Heinlein

Man is not a rational animal; he is a rationalizing animal. Credit: Robert Heinlein Source: Assignment in EternityPosts where this quotation is embedded Science Curiosity A desire to seek out and consume scientific information just for the pleasureTags: motivated reasoning (14) | rationality (7) | reasoning (51) | Robert Heinlein (2)Google Web Search Photo Credits: Pixabay (Pixabay)This … Continue reading Man Is Not a Rational Animal; He Is a Rationalizing Animal Robert Heinlein

Why You Think You’re Right – Even If You’re Wrong Julia Galef (2016)

  Why you think you’re right – even if you’re wrong | Julia Galef Perspective is everything, especially when it comes to examining your beliefs. Are you a soldier, prone to defending your viewpoint at all costs — or a scout, spurred by curiosity? Julia Galef examines the motivations behind these two mindsets and how they … Continue reading Why You Think You’re Right – Even If You’re Wrong Julia Galef (2016)

Julia Galef Writer and public speaker

Julia Galef is co-founder of the Center for Applied Rationality. She is a writer and public speaker on the topics of rationality, science, technology, and design. WebsiteJulia GalefWikipediaJulia GalefRSS FeedJulia GalefTwitterjuliagalefYouTubeJulia GalefGoogleJulia Galef Twitter Tweets by Julia Galef RSS FeedPosts: Julia GalefConverse in Good Faith Be sincere, fair, open, and honest, regardless of the outcomeScience … Continue reading Julia Galef Writer and public speaker

Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don’t by Julia Galef (2021)

In this book, The Scout Mindset, Julia Galef explains that we see what we want to see when it comes to what we believe. In other words, we have what Julia Galef calls a “soldier” mindset. From tribalism and wishful thinking to rationalizing in our personal lives and everything in between, we are driven to … Continue reading Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don’t by Julia Galef (2021)

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber (2010)

Abstract Reasoning is generally seen as a means to improve knowledge and make better decisions. However, much evidence shows that reasoning often leads to epistemic distortions and poor decisions. This suggests that the function of reasoning should be rethought. Our hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative. It is to devise and evaluate … Continue reading Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber (2010)

Moral Reasoning Is Generally Done Post-hoc Jonathan Haidt

My research examines the intuitive foundations of morality. I have found that moral reasoning is generally done post-hoc, to search for confirmation of our fast, automatic intuitive responses. I am therefore skeptical of the power of reasoning to bring us to the right conclusions, particularly when self-interest or reputational concerns are in play. I therefore … Continue reading Moral Reasoning Is Generally Done Post-hoc Jonathan Haidt

Anyone Who Values Truth Should Stop Worshiping Reason Jonathan Haidt (2013)

Anyone who values truth should stop worshiping reason. Credit: Jonathan Haidt Posts where this quotation is embedded Science Curiosity A desire to seek out and consume scientific information just for the pleasureBooks: Jonathan HaidtThe Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Jonathan Haidt, Greg … Continue reading Anyone Who Values Truth Should Stop Worshiping Reason Jonathan Haidt (2013)

Science Curiosity A desire to seek out and consume scientific information just for the pleasure

Motivated reasoning is where we look for arguments in favor of conclusions we want to believe, regardless of the evidence. This is a primary stumbling block in forming sound beliefs and making good decisions. However, if we are science-curious, we are more likely to explore data contradicting our worldview and are less prone to this … Continue reading Science Curiosity A desire to seek out and consume scientific information just for the pleasure

Motivated Reasoning ** Leads people to confirm what they already believe, while ignoring contrary data

Motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias in which an individual’s desire to believe or not believe in something influences their interpretation of new evidence. It refers to the tendency for people to selectively search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or denies their preexisting beliefs or hypotheses while giving less … Continue reading Motivated Reasoning ** Leads people to confirm what they already believe, while ignoring contrary data