Blook Post: The Spectrum of Intelligence @DavidGurteen
CHAPTER: Artificial Intelligence

The Spectrum of Intelligence There are many types of intelligence

4 thoughts on “The Spectrum of Intelligence There are many types of intelligence

  1. You seem to interested in finding clever ways to define intelligence as an abstract concept. Have you ever considered observing intelligence factually without your words?

    1. Hi Juha-Matti,

      Thanks for your question.

      I am not trying to find clever ways to define intelligence as an abstract concept, though it may seem like that.

      If I am going to think deeply about intelligence and AI, I first need to unpack the different meanings of the word to create a thinking framework. I have tried to do this. I now have a different view of what constitutes intelligence than I did a few months ago.

      In its broadest sense, intelligence is the ability to comprehend and purposefully react to information, usually sensory data from the surrounding environment. This definition applies equally to intelligence in biological organisms like humans and artificial entities like machines.

      I write to think.

      What I have written is the basis for further research and thinking.

      What’s my aim? I want to better understand the nature of intelligence (and artificial intelligence) so that I can better understand human nature, how we have evolved as part of the universe, and how we reason.

      If we can better understand our nature and how we reason and make decisions, we will be in a better position to ensure that humanity survives and thrives.

      While pure observation has its place, the interplay between observing, thinking, and articulating our thoughts through language is essential for advancing our knowledge and sharing our work.

      I’d love to hear in more detail what you mean by “observing intelligence”.

      Thanks, David

  2. What is the relationship of thinking and intelligence?

    The word is not the thing it describes, and definitely no description of a word is in any actual relation to what it describes.

    If we are interested in the nature of intelligence, clearly we cannot be concerned about abstractions about it. Is that possible?

    1. I understand the limitations of language in capturing the essence of anything, but doesn’t avoiding the value of abstractions altogether inhibit our ability to conceptualize, communicate, and advance our understanding of complex phenomena like intelligence?

Leave a Reply