How Can Groups Make Good Decisions? Mariano Sigman and Dan Ariely (2017)

video player How can groups make good decisions? | Mariano Sigman and Dan Ariely Mariano closes this talk with the . You can read the transcript below. Partial Transcript Good collective decisions require two components: deliberation and diversity of opinions. Right now, the way we typically make our voice heard in many societies is through … Continue reading How Can Groups Make Good Decisions? Mariano Sigman and Dan Ariely (2017)

The Future of Reasoning Reason and logic are struggling

video player The Future of Reasoning | Michael Stevens (Lottocracy) Posts where this video is embedded Democracy’s Spectrum ** From Direct to Representative The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason We did not evolve to reason individually but to reason sociallyVideos: Michael Stevens, Dan Sperber, Hugo MercierThe Future of Reasoning Reason and logic are strugglingTags: confirmation bias (5) … Continue reading The Future of Reasoning Reason and logic are struggling

Social Reasoning The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason

Gurteen Knowledge Blog   May 7, 2021, 15:34I recently came across a fascinating theory concerning the evolution of human reason known as “The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason”. However, I prefer to use the term “theory of social reasoning” or simply “social reasoning”. The theory proposes that the primary function of reason is not to improve our … Continue reading Social Reasoning The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason

Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: the Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland Jane Suiter, David M Farrell , Clodagh Harris and Philip Murphy

Abstract This paper compares the debate quality in the plenary sessions of an Irish Citizens’ Assembly and an Irish parliamentary committee to assess the epistemic effects of public deliberation on a contentious subject: abortion. The unusual occurrence of a similar process of detailed discussion on the same topic in different institutions at around the same … Continue reading Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: the Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland Jane Suiter, David M Farrell , Clodagh Harris and Philip Murphy

Evaluation of Climate Assembly UK Stephen Elstub, David M. Farrell, Jayne Carrick and Patricia Mockler (2021)

Executive Summary Overview This report provides an evaluation of Climate Assembly UK (CAUK). This was a citizens’ assembly commissioned by six select committees from the House of Commons: Business Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS); Environmental Audit; Housing, Communities and Local Government, Science and Technology; Transport; and Treasury. It was tasked with providing recommendations on how … Continue reading Evaluation of Climate Assembly UK Stephen Elstub, David M. Farrell, Jayne Carrick and Patricia Mockler (2021)

Event: London Knowledge Café: Conversational Collective Intelligence – a New Kind of Democracy Thursday 2nd May 2024

London Knowledge Café Conversational Collective Intelligence: A New Kind of Democracy Date: Thursday 2nd May 2024 Time: 18:30 to 20:30 BST This is a free event. Please arrive at 6:00 pm or shortly after, allowing you time to settle in and meet other people. Light refreshments will be available. The Café will start promptly at … Continue reading Event: London Knowledge Café: Conversational Collective Intelligence – a New Kind of Democracy Thursday 2nd May 2024

Evolution of Democracy **

Democracy has a rich and complex history that dates back to ancient civilizations. The term itself originates from the Greek words “demos” (people) and “kratos” (power), reflecting its foundational principle of people’s rule. The most celebrated early example of a democratic system is found in ancient Athens in the 5th century BCE. Athenian democracy was … Continue reading Evolution of Democracy **

The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason We did not evolve to reason individually but to reason socially

The argumentative theory of reasoning proposes that reason did not evolve to help us to reason individually but to reason together – in other words, socially. Reasoning is generally seen as the process of thinking about something to help us come to better beliefs and decisions. However, there is substantial evidence that our reasoning process, … Continue reading The Argumentative Theory of Human Reason We did not evolve to reason individually but to reason socially

Wisdom of Crowds of Crowds Crowds within a crowd outperform 'wisdom of the crowd'

The wisdom of crowds is the concept that large groups of people are collectively smarter than individuals regarding problem-solving, decision-making, and predicting. However, the method can be improved with the wisdom of crowds of crowds. In the concept of the wisdom of crowds, individuals in a group are privately asked to answer a question, such … Continue reading Wisdom of Crowds of Crowds Crowds within a crowd outperform ‘wisdom of the crowd’