Science Literacy Magnifies Political Polarization on Policy-relevant Science Dan Kahan

It has been assumed (very reasonably) for many years that enlightened self-government demands a science-literate citizenry. Perversely, however, recent research has shown that all manner of reasoning proficiency – from cognitive reflection to numeracy, from actively open-minded thinking to science literacy – magnifies political polarization on … | Dan Kahan Continue reading Science Literacy Magnifies Political Polarization on Policy-relevant Science Dan Kahan

Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (January 2017)

Abstract This article describes evidence suggesting that science curiosity counteracts politically biased information processing. This finding is in tension with two bodies of research. The first casts doubt on the existence of “curiosity” as a measurable disposition. The other suggests that individual differences in cognition related to science comprehension — of which science curiosity, if Continue reading Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (January 2017)

Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: the Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland Jane Suiter, David M Farrell , Clodagh Harris and Philip Murphy

Abstract This paper compares the debate quality in the plenary sessions of an Irish Citizens’ Assembly and an Irish parliamentary committee to assess the epistemic effects of public deliberation on a contentious subject: abortion. The unusual occurrence of a similar process of detailed discussion on the same topic in different institutions at around the same Continue reading Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: the Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland Jane Suiter, David M Farrell , Clodagh Harris and Philip Murphy

Why We Hate Our Political Enemies — and How to Stop Arthur Brooks

Why we hate our political enemies — and how to stop | Arthur Brooks People: Arthur Brooks (1)Arthur C. Brooks American social scientistBooks: Arthur Brooks (4)Arthur C. Brooks American social scientistLove Your Enemies — Disagree Better, Not Less Arthur BrooksLove Your Enemies — Say No to Contempt Arthur BrooksLove Your Enemies: How Decent People Can Continue reading Why We Hate Our Political Enemies — and How to Stop Arthur Brooks

Dialogic Learning Learning through conversation and difference

Education has long treated knowledge as something to be transmitted from teacher to student. Yet this one-way model no longer prepares us for a world of complexity and difference. Dialogic education offers an alternative path where learning becomes a shared inquiry, and understanding grows through genuine conversation. Continue reading Dialogic Learning Learning through conversation and difference

Sam Harris’s “Great Problem” and Conversational Leadership The vital connection

Sam Harris describes conversation as the only real alternative to violence. But today, meaningful dialogue is rare, especially across difference. Conversational Leadership offers a way to rebuild that possibility through everyday practices of listening, questioning, and staying present. Continue reading Sam Harris’s “Great Problem” and Conversational Leadership The vital connection

The Perils of Binary Bias ** Simplifying complex issues into two extreme and opposing categories

Introduction In an increasingly complex and interconnected world, the concept of binary bias, also known as binary thinking or black-and-white thinking, has gained significant relevance and importance. This cognitive bias reflects our innate tendency to simplify intricate issues, situations, or concepts by viewing them through an oversimplified lens, often inadvertently causing harm to society. … Continue reading The Perils of Binary Bias ** Simplifying complex issues into two extreme and opposing categories

Polarization Is Tearing Us Apart We are polarized across political, religious, moral, and racial divides

Polarization is reshaping how we perceive and communicate with one another. Disagreement has turned into division, and conversation into confrontation. We need new ways of talking that rebuild trust, restore understanding, and make it possible to think together across our differences. Continue reading Polarization Is Tearing Us Apart We are polarized across political, religious, moral, and racial divides

Filter Bubbles, Epistemic Bubbles and Echo Chambers Distort the reality of the world

Online platforms personalize content based on past behavior, shaping what information we see. This creates filter bubbles and epistemic bubbles, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives. Recognizing these patterns helps break out of intellectual isolation and engage with broader viewpoints. Continue reading Filter Bubbles, Epistemic Bubbles and Echo Chambers Distort the reality of the world