Abstract
This article describes evidence suggesting that science curiosity counteracts politically biased information processing. This finding is in tension with two bodies of research.
The first casts doubt on the existence of “curiosity” as a measurable disposition. The other suggests that individual differences in cognition related to science comprehension — of which science curiosity, if it exists, would presumably be one — do not mitigate politically biased information processing but instead aggravate it.
The article describes the scale‐development strategy employed to overcome the problems associated with measuring science curiosity. It also reports data, observational and experimental, showing that science curiosity promotes open‐minded engagement with information that is contrary to individuals’ political predispositions.
We conclude by identifying a series of concrete research questions posed by these results.
Authors
Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Article
Posts that link to this paper
- Science Curiosity A desire to seek out and consume scientific information for pleasure
Posts: Dan Kahan (3)
Quotations: Dan Kahan (2)
Videos: Dan Kahan (1)
Papers: Dan Kahan (1)
Image Credits: Midjourney
(Public Domain)In-person, 7–11 September 2026, Warbrook House, Hampshire, UK
We are living and working in conditions of uncertainty, complexity, and rapid change. Many leadership approaches still rely on control, expertise, and tools that no longer fit the realities people face.
This week-long immersive workshop brings people together to practise Conversational Leadership as a shared, lived experience. It is not a training course but a space to slow down, think together, and explore how leadership emerges through dialogue, responsibility, and real engagement.