It’s easy to move from one activity to the next without pausing to reflect. This absence of reflection often results in repeated mistakes and missed opportunities for improvement. As a vital tool in Conversational Leadership, regularly using After-Action Reviews allows teams to learn from their experiences and enhance performance.
Background
In today’s fast-paced business environment, achieving success requires collaboration and continuous learning at the individual and team levels. Each day presents opportunities to reflect on our actions, learn from our experiences, and improve performance. This can be done by analyzing what happened during an activity, why it happened, and what can be learned.
However, the constant demands of business—such as managing projects, giving presentations, or attending meetings—can often make it difficult to find time for reflection. The urgency to meet deadlines and respond to emerging challenges means we frequently move on to the next task without pausing to review what went well or what could be improved. This dynamic can play out on a personal, team, and even organizational level. For example, after completing a project, there might be pressure to move quickly to the next one before taking the time to conduct a review, leading to disbanded teams and missed learning opportunities. As a result, valuable insights are lost, mistakes get repeated, and a culture of blame can develop.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. By incorporating a simple discipline known as after-action reviews (AARs), we can make time for regular reflection, which helps to refine our approach, prevent repeated errors, and create a culture of continuous improvement.
Introduction
An After-Action Review (AAR) is a structured discussion that allows individuals or teams to reflect on a specific business event or activity. Through AARs, we ask fundamental questions: What happened? Why did it happen? How did it happen? What can we learn from it? These reflective discussions promote a culture of learning rather than assigning blame.
AARs can be applied to various activities, from a quick five-minute conversation after a meeting to a comprehensive review at the end of a large project. The lessons learned during AARs can be both tacitly absorbed by the individuals involved and formally documented for broader organizational learning.
After-Action Reviews: A Continuous Learning Tool
The simplicity of AARs is their strength. After every business activity, participants should ask themselves:
- What were the desired outcomes?
- What were the actual results?
- Why did the outcomes differ from what was planned?
- What lessons were learned?
An “event” could be as small as a ten-minute client call or as significant as a multi-year project. Regardless of the scale, the purpose remains the same: to reflect, learn, and improve for the future. The depth and complexity of the AAR should match the size of the event, whether it’s a personal reflection after a small task or a team review after a major project.
Types of AARs: Formal, Informal, and Personal
AARs can take on different forms depending on the context, yet they all follow the same general framework of sharing observations, insights, and learning.
Formal AARs
These are typically used for larger, more complex events like major projects. These reviews involve external observers, data collection, and preparation. They require more time and resources to conduct but offer in-depth analysis and structured feedback.
Informal AARs
These are more spontaneous, requiring little or no preparation. Informal AARs are particularly powerful due to their flexibility. Anyone can conduct them on the spot for events such as presentations or sales meetings. These quick reviews provide immediate learning opportunities and can be held virtually anywhere.
Personal AARs
Conducted by individuals after small tasks or events, personal AARs allow for self-reflection. They can be quick and informal—such as after a client call—or more formal, as part of a structured review with a mentor or coach. Personal AARs provide an opportunity for individual growth and continuous learning.
Key Principles for Effective After-Action Reviews
Conduct Immediately
AARs should take place immediately after or even during an event. This ensures that memories are fresh, participants are available, and lessons can be applied immediately.
Focus on Intended Objectives
The focus should remain on whether the intended objectives were met and why. This keeps the conversation on target and allows for meaningful insights.
Focus on Individual, Leader, and Team Performance
AARs should consider the performance of individuals, leaders, and the entire team. This offers a comprehensive view of what worked and what needs improvement.
Facilitate Discussions
AARs should have a facilitator whenever possible. Formal AARs require this, but informal or personal AARs may not.
Observe Events
When feasible, events should be observed by someone who can offer objective feedback, particularly for formal AARs.
Ensure Full Participation
Everyone involved in the event should participate in the AAR. There should be no representatives or observers; direct involvement is essential.
Create an Open, Blameless Climate
The atmosphere should be open, blameless, and focused on solving problems. AARs should not be tied to performance reviews and should remain free from fear of repercussions.
Record Learnings
Lessons learned should be documented. Writing helps reinforce reflection, encourages action, and makes it easier to track trends over time.
The Origin and Adoption of AARs
The After-Action Review was first developed in the 1970s by the U.S. Army as a learning tool to extract lessons from combat training exercises. In combat, the reasons for success or failure are not always immediately clear, and AARs were created to help soldiers analyze their experiences and improve performance. This practice has become deeply embedded in military culture, with AARs conducted after every training event.
The business world began adopting AARs in the late 1990s. Harvard Business School professor David Garvin published one of the earliest articles on Building a Learning Organization in 1993. Companies like BP-Amoco, General Electric, Motorola, and Steelcase have successfully integrated AARs into their corporate cultures to improve and continuously learn from past experiences.
Despite the proven success of AARs in the military, many organizations struggle to incorporate them into their business practices effectively. Often, the process becomes too rigid or technical, losing the open and dynamic nature that makes AARs such a powerful tool for learning.
Yet, most every corporate effort to graft this truly innovative practice into their culture has failed because, again and again, people reduce the living practice of AAR's to a sterile technique.
After Action Review (AAR) Method | AZ Consulting
To practice Conversational Leadership effectively, integrate After-Action Reviews into your routine. These structured conversations create space for open dialogue, helping teams learn from their experiences. Regularly discussing successes and challenges encourages shared learning and continuous improvement, strengthening team dynamics and overall performance through thoughtful conversation.
Resources
- Wikipedia: After-action review
Posts that link to this post
- Conversation Sharpens the Saw It is not a waste of time
- The Four Levels of Knowledge Management The relation between Conversational Leadership and Knowledge Management
- Make Time to Talk The lack of time for conversation is just an excuse
- After-action Reviews – Are We Lazy? A conversation after an event to discuss improvement
POST NAVIGATION
CHAPTER NAVIGATION
SEARCH
Blook SearchGoogle Web Search
Photo Credits: Midjourney ()
The Gurteen Knowledge Letter is a free monthly newsletter with over 20,000 subscribers that I have been publishing by email for over 20 years.
Learn more about the newsletter and register here.