video player
How can groups make good decisions? | Mariano Sigman and Dan Ariely
Mariano closes this talk with the following at 07:32 . You can read the transcript below.
Partial Transcript
Good collective decisions require two components: deliberation and diversity of opinions.
Right now, the way we typically make our voice heard in many societies is through direct or indirect voting.
This is good for diversity of opinions, and it has the great virtue of ensuring that everyone gets to express their voice.
But it’s not so good [for fostering] thoughtful debates.
Our experiments suggest a different method that may be effective in balancing these two goals at the same time, by forming small groups that converge to a single decision while still maintaining diversity of opinions because there are many independent groups.
Of course, it’s much easier to agree on the height of the Eiffel Tower than on moral, political, and ideological issues. But in a time when the world’s problems are more complex and people are more polarized, using science to help us understand how we interact and make decisions will hopefully spark interesting new ways to construct a better democracy.
Paper
Posts where this video is embeddedVideos: Mariano Sigman, Dan ArielyTags: cognitive diversity (8) | Dan Ariely (1) | decision making (44) | deliberative democracy (12) | democracy (34) | Mariano Sigman (2) | small groups (23) | social reasoning (19) | wisdom of crowds (4)
Blook Search
Google Web Search
Photo Credits: Gerd Altmann (CC0 1.0)
If you enjoy my work and find it valuable, please consider giving me a little support. Your donation will help cover some of my website hosting expenses.
Make a donation