Abstract
Why does public conflict over societal risks persist in the face of compelling and widely accessible scientific evidence? We conducted an experiment to probe two alternative answers: the ‘science comprehension thesis’ (SCT), which identifies defects in the public’s knowledge and reasoning capacities as the source of such controversies; and the ‘identity-protective cognition thesis’ (ICT), which treats cultural conflict as disabling the faculties that members of the public use to make sense of decision-relevant science.
In our experiment, we presented subjects with a difficult problem that turned on their ability to draw valid causal inferences from empirical data. As expected, subjects highest in numeracy – a measure of the ability and disposition to make use of quantitative information – did substantially better than less numerate ones when the data were presented as results from a study of a new skin rash treatment.
Also as expected, subjects’ responses became politically polarized – and even less accurate – when the same data were presented as results from the study of a gun-control ban. But contrary to the prediction of SCT, such polarization did not abate among subjects highest in numeracy; instead, it increased.
This outcome supported ICT, which predicted that more numerate subjects would use their quantitative-reasoning capacity selectively to conform their interpretation of the data to the result most consistent with their political outlooks. We discuss the theoretical and practical significance of these findings.
Authors
- Dan M. Kahan, Yale Law School
- Ellen Peters, Ohio State University – Psychology Department; Decision Research; University of Oregon
- Erica Dawson,Cornell University
- Paul Slovic, Decision Research; University of Oregon – Department of Psychology
Paper
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
Posts that link to this paper
- Dan Kahan Professor of Psychology at Yale Law School
- How Beliefs Shape Reasoning How political views influence the way we interpret data
Posts: Dan Kahan (3)
Quotations: Dan Kahan (2)
Videos: Dan Kahan (1)
Papers: Dan Kahan (1)
Tags: Dan Kahan (9) | motivated reasoning (14)
Blook Search
Google Web Search
Photo Credits: Midjourney (Public Domain)
In-person, 7–11 September 2026, Warbrook House, Hampshire, UK
We are living and working in conditions of uncertainty, complexity, and rapid change. Many leadership approaches still rely on control, expertise, and tools that no longer fit the realities people face.
This week-long immersive workshop brings people together to practise Conversational Leadership as a shared, lived experience. It is not a training course but a space to slow down, think together, and explore how leadership emerges through dialogue, responsibility, and real engagement.