It’s OK Not to Have an Opinion Richard Feynman
Did you know that it’s actually possible for you to say “I don’t know enough about this to have an opinion”. | Richard Feynman Continue reading It’s OK Not to Have an Opinion Richard Feynman
an online book by David Gurteen
Humility is the quality of being humble. The Oxford Dictionary, in its 1998 edition, describes humility as a low self-regard and sense of unworthiness. However, humility involves having an accurate opinion of oneself and expressing oneself modestly as situations demand, with clear goal orientation, openness, broad-mindedness, and a non-imposing mentality. In a religious context, humility can mean a recognition of self about a deity (i.e. God) and subsequent submission to that deity as a religious member. Outside of a religious context, humility is defined as being "unselved"—liberated from the consciousness of self—a form of temperance that is neither having pride (or haughtiness) nor indulging in self-deprecation.
Humility refers to a proper sense of self-regard. In contrast, humiliation involves the external imposition of shame on a person. Humility may be misinterpreted as the capacity to endure humiliation through self-denigration. This misconception arises from the confusion of humility with traits like submissiveness and meekness. Such misinterpretations prioritize self-preservation and self-aggrandizement over true humility, and emphasizes an undiminished focus on the self.
In many religious and philosophical traditions, humility is regarded as a virtue that prioritizes social harmony. It strikes a balance between two sets of qualities. This equilibrium lies in having a reduced focus on oneself, which leads to lower self-importance and diminished arrogance, while also possessing the ability to demonstrate strength, assertiveness, and courage. This virtue is exhibited in the pursuit of upholding social harmony and recognizing our human dependence on it. It contrasts with maliciousness, hubris, and other negative forms of pride, and is an idealistic and rare intrinsic construct that has an extrinsic side.
Credit: Wikipedia - humilityDid you know that it’s actually possible for you to say “I don’t know enough about this to have an opinion”. | Richard Feynman Continue reading It’s OK Not to Have an Opinion Richard Feynman
Become an intellectual explorer: Master the art of conversation | Emily Chamlee-Wright Posts where this video is embedded Conclusion: Two Pillars of Truth Critical thinking – a civic duty Conclusion: Two Worlds Living in two worlds Congruence, Coherence, and Contingent Truth Building a framework for understanding Conversations and the Adjacent Possible How dialogue creates quiet shifts in what is … Continue reading Become an Intellectual Explorer: Master the Art of Conversation Emily Chamlee-Wright
Intellectual humility is the recognition that our reasoning is so flawed, so prone to bias, that we can rarely be certain that we are right. | Greg Lukianoff & Jonathan Haidt Continue reading Intellectual Humility Greg Lukianoff & Jonathan Haidt
AustraliaAustriaBrazilCanadaChinaCzech RepublicEgyptFranceGermanyGlobalIndiaItalyJapanMexicoNetherlandsPolandSaudia ArabiaSingaporeSpainTurkeyUAEUnited KingdomUnited States As an Amazon Associate, I earn a small commission when you purchase a book via this site. Posts where this book is embedded Conclusion: Two Pillars of Truth Critical thinking – a civic duty Conclusion: Two Worlds Living in two worlds Congruence, Coherence, and Contingent Truth Building a framework for understanding Conversations … Continue reading Humble Inquiry: the Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling by Edgar H. Schein (2013)
Recognising New Age Mumbo Jumbo The History of the Socratic Method Close Pop-up all posts in this chapter What’s the Vibe? Please be patient as this may take up to a minute to load… Close The Socratic method uses dialogue to stimulate critical thinking and challenge assumptions, aligning closely with the principles of Conversational Leadership. … Continue reading The Socratic Method A powerful tool for critical thinking