Democracy’s theoretical ideals clash with citizens’ limited expertise; the loudest voices often prevail over the wisest. Socrates proposed a balanced approach – civic education to cultivate wisdom alongside expert policy guidance to strengthen democratic governance.
Socrates was one of the most influential Greek philosophers who lived in Athens during the 5th century BCE. He was known for questioning conventional wisdom and engaging fellow Athenians in dialogues about virtue, justice, and the ideal political system.
Socrates had a nuanced view of democracy. While he valued its ideals, like freedom of speech and equal participation of all citizens, he also recognized some weaknesses in how it was practiced in Athens during his time.
Specifically, Socrates worried that most citizens lacked the knowledge and wisdom to make informed public policy and governance decisions. He viewed participating in politics as a skill – like sailing or medicine – that required proper training and expertise. Without this, Socrates felt democracy could easily lead to mob rule where the loudest and most persuasive voices prevailed rather than the wisest.
Socrates also feared demagogues because they manipulated public opinion with emotional appeals instead of rational arguments. He believed they exploited ignorance and prejudices, undermining democracy, leading to poor decisions, and threatening society’s moral and intellectual integrity.
Additionally, Socrates observed that democracies emphasized freedom over order, which could lead to chaos and instability. He argued that a thriving democratic society needed to balance freedom with law and order. Citizens had to exercise their democratic rights responsibly and for the greater social good.
Socrates did not outright reject democracy. But he believed it needed to be combined with a strong emphasis on civic education, expert guidance on policy, and the cultivation of wisdom and virtue among the citizenry. Rather than give absolute power to the people, Socrates would have preferred a political system where the wisest individuals were identified and put in leadership positions for society’s benefit.
Why Socrates Hated Democracy | The School of LifeIn a republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important?
And what duty more pressing than communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of the country?
Credit: Unknown but often misattributed to Winston Churchill
As societies evolve, it would be helpful to look back at Socrates’ ideas about balancing democracy with relying on knowledge and expertise. His thoughts may help guide us towards more informed and sustainable ways of governing. For democracy to keep improving, we must consistently reflect and make reforms.
Posts that link to this post
POST NAVIGATION
CHAPTER NAVIGATION
SEARCH
Blook SearchGoogle Web Search
Related Items
Photo Credits: Michael D Beckwith (Unsplash)
The Gurteen Knowledge Letter is a free monthly newsletter with over 20,000 subscribers that I have been publishing by email for over 20 years.
Learn more about the newsletter and register here.