Actor-network theory (ANT) expands our understanding of the factors and forces that shape outcomes in complex systems by recognizing the role of non-human entities. However, focusing exclusively on these elements can risk overlooking the distinct influence of human agency. By incorporating human interpretation and decision-making, ANT provides a richer and more nuanced perspective on how change occurs within complex systems.
Human agency remains a critical and unique factor within the framework of Actor-network theory (ANT), even as the theory highlights the role of non-human entities in shaping outcomes. While ANT broadens our understanding of how systems function by recognizing non-human actants like technology, infrastructure, and physical environments, it does not diminish the importance of human agency. Human agency shapes and interprets the interactions between actants that drive change.
The Role of Human Agency in Complex Systems
Human agency involves the ability of individuals or groups to make decisions, exercise control, and interpret the world around them based on beliefs, values, and intentions. In complex systems, people play a key role in interpreting non-human actants, responding to them, and adapting behavior. Although non-human actants (like technology or legal frameworks) influence behavior and outcomes, human agency brings intentionality, creativity, and decision-making into the equation.
For instance, even when new technologies like smartphones or digital platforms are introduced (acting as non-human actants), human actors—consumers, business leaders, legislators—choose how to use these technologies, set policies, and adapt practices. While ANT emphasizes the distributed nature of agency across all actants, humans contribute unique complexities such as emotional responses, cultural values, and cognitive interpretation that non-human actants do not.
Human Agency and the Interpretation of Change
Human agency is especially important because individuals interpret and adapt to changes differently based on their experiences, beliefs, and cultural contexts. For example, the shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic was facilitated by non-human actants like digital platforms (Zoom, Slack) and home environments. However, the success of this shift also depended on human agency—how employees and employers adapted to the new tools, adjusted their workflows, and reevaluated their productivity.
This dynamic interaction shows that non-human actants alone cannot create lasting change. Human interpretation, adaptation, and intentional decision-making are essential for embedding change that aligns with social, cultural, and psychological realities.
Human Agency in Uber’s Rise
Uber’s success illustrates the balance between non-human actants and human agency. While technologies like GPS, mobile apps, and digital payment systems were crucial to enabling Uber’s business model, human actors— consumers and drivers—shaped how these technologies were used. Consumers embraced the convenience of app-based services, while drivers adapted to new working conditions, relying on their agency to interpret the risks and benefits of gig economy employment.
Additionally, the legal frameworks and social norms that evolved to accommodate Uber involved deliberate human decisions. Legislators had to adapt laws while cities grappled with how ride-sharing services fit into existing transportation ecosystems. Human agency was critical in interpreting and responding to these shifts, determining Uber’s broader impact on society.
The Interplay Between Human Agency and Non-Human Actants
While ANT posits that non-human actants like technology or infrastructure can have agency in shaping outcomes, human agency remains vital in mediating, interpreting, and responding to these influences. Without human agency, changes introduced by non-human actants could become mechanical or ineffective. For example, introducing new technology in an organization will not result in meaningful change if people resist or misunderstand it.
Moreover, complex feedback loops within systems often require human agency to manage and navigate the consequences of changes. When new interactions between actants create unforeseen disruptions, human decision-makers must adapt and find solutions. This capacity for flexibility and intentional problem-solving sets human agency apart in complex systems.
Conclusion: The Essential Role of Human Agency
While Actor-Network Theory expands the concept of agency to include non-human elements, human agency often plays a critical role in shaping and interacting with many complex systems. People are not passive recipients of change imposed by technology or infrastructure; they actively interpret, shape, and influence outcomes based on their values, beliefs, and choices. Human agency provides the intentionality and interpretation that allow complex systems to adapt and evolve in ways that align with broader cultural, social, and psychological contexts.
ANT’s recognition of non-human actants does not diminish human agency. Instead, it highlights how crucial it is for people to navigate, adapt to, and make sense of the interactions that drive change within complex networks. Balancing the influence of non-human actants with the unique role of human agency offers a more holistic approach to understanding and managing change in complex systems.
Recognizing the interplay between human agency and non-human actants can help us approach change more effectively. By actively interpreting, adapting, and responding to all influences within complex systems, we ensure that changes align with social and cultural contexts. Prioritize human agency to bring purpose and direction to these interactions.
POST NAVIGATION
CHAPTER NAVIGATION
SEARCH
Blook SearchGoogle Web Search
Photo Credits: Midjourney (Public Domain)
The Gurteen Knowledge Letter is a free monthly newsletter with over 20,000 subscribers that I have been publishing by email for over 20 years.
Learn more about the newsletter and register here.