The Google 20% Free Time Policy Innovation Story: A catalyst for innovation

Silicon Valley Versus Route 128

Building 20 at MIT

In the early 2000s, Google introduced its 20% time policy that let workers spend one day a week on their own projects. This helped employees create new ideas while still doing their main jobs. Though it was hard to manage as the company grew, this approach led to successful products like Gmail and AdSense. Google showed how giving workers some freedom can spark creativity in a company.

From an innovation standpoint, this policy was groundbreaking because it allowed employees to explore ideas beyond the limits of their formal roles, encouraging experimentation, boosting intrinsic motivation, and creating opportunities for groundbreaking products.

This policy exemplified elements of Conversational Leadership, where employees engaged in open dialogue and inquiry, contributing ideas beyond their defined roles to foster a culture of innovation.

The Foundations of Google’s 20% Time

The 20% time concept at Google was inspired by the belief that some of the best ideas come from passionate, intrinsically motivated people working on problems they care deeply about. Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google’s co-founders, designed this policy to give employees the space to explore ideas that weren’t necessarily aligned with Google’s immediate business objectives but had the potential to create future value.

It represented a shift from the traditional, top-down approach to innovation towards a more decentralized model, empowering individual employees to be active participants in the company’s innovation process.

Unlocking Intrinsic Motivation

One of the most significant advantages of the 20% time policy was its ability to harness intrinsic motivation. By allowing employees to pursue projects of personal interest, Google tapped into a powerful source of creative energy. People are often more innovative when they work on projects they’re passionate about rather than those assigned through top-down directives. This motivation led employees to bring more energy, focus, and perseverance to their projects. They weren’t just working to meet quarterly targets; they were driven by curiosity and the desire to create something meaningful.

Psychological studies have shown intrinsic motivation is key to creativity and innovative thinking. Google’s 20% policy provided an environment where employees could explore and experiment, unhindered by strict performance metrics or expectations. By fostering a sense of ownership and purpose, Google encouraged employees to take risks and explore unconventional ideas, leading to a higher likelihood of disruptive innovation.

A Decentralized Approach to Innovation

Google’s 20% time policy exemplifies the power of decentralized innovation. Rather than relying solely on a dedicated R&D department to drive new ideas, Google empowered every employee to act as an innovator. This approach allowed for a diversity of ideas and perspectives to flourish across the company, resulting in a richer array of innovative projects. Instead of following a narrowly defined roadmap, employees could explore different avenues, sometimes even creating products and services that were far removed from Google’s core business at the time.

This decentralized approach also created a system of parallel experimentation. By allowing employees across departments to work on different projects simultaneously, Google maximized the chances of breakthrough innovations emerging. Unlike traditional R&D, where resources are concentrated on a few select projects, the 20% time policy enabled Google to pursue a wider range of ideas, increasing the likelihood that some would turn into successful products.

Major Innovations from Google’s 20% Time

The success of Google’s 20% time policy is best illustrated through the products and features it helped bring to life. Some of Google’s most iconic innovations, including Gmail, Google News, and AdSense, originated as 20% time projects. These products not only became core parts of Google’s business but also shaped the landscape of the internet and online advertising.

Gmail

Developed as a 20% time project by engineer Paul Buchheit, Gmail redefined web-based email by offering significantly more storage and a search-based interface. Its success transformed how people use email, eventually setting a new industry standard and becoming one of Google’s flagship products.

Google News

Another project born from 20% time, Google News was developed by Krishna Bharat after the September 11 attacks. Bharat noticed that news coverage of the event was fragmented and developed an algorithm to aggregate news from multiple sources. Google News went on to become a key source of information for millions of users worldwide.

AdSense

AdSense, which allowed website owners to earn revenue by displaying Google’s targeted ads, was also initially developed during 20% time. It became a core part of Google’s business model, helping Google dominate the online advertising industry and generating billions in revenue.

These successes underscore the power of the 20% time policy in fostering creativity and innovation. By giving employees the freedom to pursue side projects, Google encouraged the development of ideas that may not have otherwise surfaced within traditional R&D constraints.

The Challenges of the 20% Time Policy

While Google’s 20% time policy had remarkable successes, it also faced challenges as the company grew. As Google expanded, its need for coordination, efficiency, and scalability increased, which sometimes clashed with the open-ended, flexible nature of 20% time. Large projects with immediate revenue implications naturally took precedence over speculative side projects. Managers sometimes found it difficult to balance resources between these long-term experiments and the demands of high-priority projects, which could lead to inconsistent support for 20% time initiatives.

Additionally, some employees found it difficult to balance their primary responsibilities with their side projects, especially as Google’s workload increased. As the company grew, the demands of employees’ “day jobs” began to consume more time, leaving less bandwidth for side projects. This gradually led to a reduction in the use of 20% time, with fewer employees feeling they had the freedom to work on non-essential projects.

Lessons for Innovation Culture

Google’s 20% time policy illustrates the benefits and limitations of providing structured autonomy within a corporate setting. For companies looking to foster innovation, the policy demonstrates the power of empowering employees to explore their interests and develop creative ideas. It’s not enough to rely solely on structured R&D departments; companies can greatly benefit by encouraging grassroots innovation from all levels of the organization.

Moreover, Google’s 20% time policy highlights the importance of balancing short-term priorities with long-term experimentation. While innovation policies like 20% time can drive long-term value, they also require a culture that values flexibility, resilience, and patience. To maintain such a policy, organizations need to create clear boundaries that ensure employees can pursue passion projects without compromising core business objectives. Leadership buy-in is essential, as managers need to support these initiatives and recognize the long-term benefits they bring.

Finally, Google’s 20% time story underscores the value of creating a work environment that tolerates risk and failure. Not every 20% project will succeed, but the process of experimentation and learning is invaluable. By embracing an iterative, trial-and-error approach, organizations can create a culture where employees feel safe taking risks and innovating without the fear of failure.

Broader Implications and Influence Beyond Google

Google’s 20% time policy has not only profoundly impacted the company but has also influenced other organizations and industries by demonstrating the value of autonomy and intrinsic motivation in innovation. Many companies, inspired by Google’s approach, have introduced similar initiatives to encourage creativity and experimentation among employees. For instance, Atlassian, the Australian software company, developed a “ShipIt Day” where employees have 24 hours to work on projects of their choice, which has led to successful innovations and product improvements.

The policy also highlights an important shift in how companies view employee potential and contribution. Traditionally, employees were expected to stick strictly to defined roles, with limited room for experimentation. Google’s policy challenged this, illustrating that when companies invest in their employees’ ideas and give them ownership of creative processes, it can lead to breakthrough innovations that align with or even redefine the company’s mission.

Furthermore, the 20% time policy has underscored the importance of balancing structured work with time for free exploration. In today’s fast-paced environment, where efficiency often takes priority, Google’s policy reminds us of the value of cultivating an innovative disposition that requires patience, trust, and a willingness to explore. This model has inspired a generation of leaders and entrepreneurs to think differently about fostering innovation and has led to a cultural shift toward valuing experimentation and employee-driven initiatives.

Conclusion

Google’s 20% time policy remains one of the most celebrated examples of corporate innovation strategies. By giving employees the freedom to pursue side projects, Google created an environment rich in creativity and experimentation. This policy not only led to the development of some of Google’s most successful products but also exemplified how decentralized, employee-driven innovation can thrive when companies provide the right conditions.

While the policy faced challenges as Google grew, the underlying principles remain relevant: intrinsic motivation, decentralized innovation, and a culture that values risk-taking are powerful drivers of creativity. For organizations seeking to foster a similar spirit of innovation, the story of Google’s 20% time serves as a compelling example of how structured autonomy and trust in employees’ ideas can lead to transformative breakthroughs.

To encourage innovation, companies can adopt a structured approach that grants employees time to explore side projects. Balancing short-term goals with room for creativity fosters a supportive culture for new ideas. By trusting employees’ initiative and setting clear boundaries, organizations can nurture meaningful innovations that drive long-term success.

Resources

• Wikipedia: Side project time

Innovation Stories

1. Building 20 at MIT Innovation Story: A humble wartime lab that sparked a legacy of innovation and collaboration
2. Silicon Valley Versus Route 128 Innovation Story: How Silicon Valley's open culture outpaced Route 128's closed network
3. The Google 20% Free Time Policy Innovation Story: A catalyst for innovation
4. The House of Wisdom Innovation Story: An Islamic beacon of innovation and collaboration

Posts that link to this post

•  Lessons From Google’s 20% Policy Fostering creativity through employee autonomy

POST NAVIGATION

Silicon Valley Versus Route 128

Building 20 at MIT

CHAPTER NAVIGATION

Strategy

Motivation and Engagement

Close

Pop-up all Chapters

Tags: creativity (8) | culture (21) | Google (2) | ideas (21) | ideation (4) | innovation (42) | intrinsic motivation (1) | motivation (17) | passion (6)

SEARCH