In an article in the Harvard Business Review, Rebuilding Companies as Communities, Henry Mintzberg talks about a concept called communityship. So what is communityship?
Leadership
Let’s start by talking about leadership – something with which we are familiar. Go Google leadership – you will find a wide variety of definitions. This is my definition:Anyone who has a sphere of influence can be considered a leader.
Put simply, it is something that a person, typically called a leader, does. They exhibit leadership. Most people have this ability to one degree or another.Leadership is the ability of an individual, through social influence, to enlist the support and cooperation of others in achieving common goals and in building and sustaining a community.
Communityship
So what is this strange concept that Henry Mintzberg calls communityship? With communityship, we are not talking about a single person but a group of people — a community where everyone takes responsibility and sees leadership as a practice, not as a position of authority – one where everyone practices leadership.An enterprise is a community of human beings, not a collection of human resources.
Community
Community is one of those soft, fuzzy words that many people do not fully understand and even find alienating. It is a word that gets used loosely, its meaning confused and distorted. I define it like this:
A community results from a web of complex and interdependent relationships that form over time among individuals who share common interests, values, and aspirations.
Community members care deeply about one another and work closely together towards a common purpose.
Mintzberg on communityship
Henry Mintzberg says this about communityship:
Communityship: Key to an Effective Society | Henry MintzbergHow can you recognize communityship?
That’s easy. You have found it when you walk into an organization and are struck by the energy in the place, the personal commitment of the people and their collective engagement in what they are doing.
These people don’t have to be formally empowered because they are naturally engaged. The organization respects them so they respect it.
They don’t live in mortal fear of being fired en mass because some “leader” hasn’t made his or her numbers.
Imagine an economy made up of such organizations.
Organizations as communities and communityship | Henry Mintzberg (source)
Isn’t it time to think of our organisations as communities of cooperation, and in so doing put leadership in its place: not gone, but alongside other important social processes.
What should be gone is this magic bullet of the individual as the solution to the world’s problems.
We are the solution to the world’s problems, you and me, all of us, working in concert.
This obsession with leadership is the cause of many of the world’s problems.
And with this, let us get rid of the cult of leadership, striking at least one blow at our increasing obsession with individuality.
Not to create a new cult around distributed leadership, but to recognize that the very use of the word leadership tilts thinking toward the individual and away from the community.
We don’t only need better leadership, we also need less leadership.
My thoughts on communityship
Communityship, like leadership, is a practice we can choose to adopt. It is a mindset, a belief system, a set of habits and behaviors.A positive relationship is one in which two people listen, communicate clearly without judgment, respect, and trust each other, as well as support, encourage, and help each other on a practical and emotional level.
We practice communityship by taking responsibility for the growth and development of a community we belong to, for example, the company we work for.
We establish and nurture positive relationships between ourselves and other members of the community. Furthermore, we help develop positive relationships between other members.
If you nurture something, such as a child or a young plant, you care for it while it grows and develops.If you nurture something such as a child or a young plant, you care for it while it grows and develops.
Nurturing a community is not something you do directly, but instead you nurture the relationships between the people within it.
Nurturing a community is not something you do directly; instead, you nurture the relationships within it.
So, I define communityship like this:
Communityship is a practice where community members take responsibility for that community's growth and development.
They nurture positive relationships between themselves and other members of the community.
Furthermore, they help develop positive relationships between other members.
The global community working together to nurture a better world is a prime example of what global communityship could be.
As Henry makes clear, communityship does not replace leadership — we still need individual leadership but not quite as much of it and, indeed, not the old command and control type of leadership.
Resources
- Article: From leadership to ‘communityship’
Detailed Resources
- Big Think: Humanity solved the “trust paradox” by going tribal — and paid a horrific price by David R. Samson (2023)
- Blog Post: Human Systems Are Almost Always Based On Trust by Dave Pollard (2023)
- HBR: Rethinking Trust by Roderick M. Kramer (2009)
Posts that link to this post
- The Four Levels of Knowledge Management The relation between Conversational Leadership and Knowledge Management
- Conversational Leadership Framework ** A framework to help understand the concept
- Three Questions for Meaningful Conversations Clarify focus, approach, and community-building in discussions
POST NAVIGATION
CHAPTER NAVIGATION
Tags: adaptive leadership (3) | community (46) | communityship (20) | Daniel Goleman (4) | Henry Mintzberg (14) | leadership (69) | leadership-as-practice (14) | trust (38)
SEARCH
Blook SearchGoogle Web Search
Photo Credits: Mhttps://www.midjourney.com/idjourney ()
If you enjoy my work and find it valuable, please consider giving me a little support. Your donation will help cover some of my website hosting expenses.
Make a donation