Abstract
This article describes evidence suggesting that science curiosity counteracts politically biased information processing. This finding is in tension with two bodies of research.
The first casts doubt on the existence of “curiosity” as a measurable disposition. The other suggests that individual differences in cognition related to science comprehension — of which science curiosity, if it exists, would presumably be one — do not mitigate politically biased information processing but instead aggravate it.
The article describes the scale‐development strategy employed to overcome the problems associated with measuring science curiosity. It also reports data, observational and experimental, showing that science curiosity promotes open‐minded engagement with information that is contrary to individuals’ political predispositions.
We conclude by identifying a series of concrete research questions posed by these results.
Authors
Dan M. Kahan, Asheley Landrum, Katie Carpenter, Laura Helft and Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Article
Posts that link to this paperPeople: Dan Kahan
Posts: Dan Kahan
Quotations: Dan Kahan
Videos: Dan Kahan
Papers: Dan Kahan
Tags: curiosity (23) | Dan Kahan (9) | motivated reasoning (14) | polarization (13) | science curiosity (9)
Blook Search
Google Web Search
Photo Credits: Midjourney (Public Domain)
The Gurteen Knowledge Letter is a free monthly newsletter with over 20,000 subscribers that I have been publishing by email for over 20 years.
Learn more about the newsletter and register here.